at ease

Merry Christmas!

2008-12-24T12:24:00.000-08:00

Merry Christmas!

Good everyone!
welcome to join our shop!http://www.goingce.com/As a international shop,we run the business including TV,Laptop,mobile phone,game consoles....
Hot sales, ongoing,most of the products are in the promoting now.there is the preferentail policy which is a win-win policy. you will get the premium products at the moderate price.
The Storm of price cut is waiting for your participation in!
Customer Service Phone: 8610-80656560
MSn: goingce@hotmail com
EMAIL: info@goingce com

Fucking Embarrassing

2006-07-14T21:37:00.000-07:00

This is the kind of stupid shit that makes you want to move to Canada.

War on Christmas Debate

2005-12-14T16:02:00.000-08:00

The anonymous blogger that I posted about yesterday (who I've just realized is named sean) has posted a lengthy reply to my comment on his site. This time I noticed that the comments are being moderated (not sure if they were before but I don't think so). So I'm going to post the discussion here for posterity just in case there is some level of dishonesty over there (no insinuation...yet). UPDATE: My comment was approved so maybe I just missed the required comment moderation previously.

sean had this to say:

Let’s see. First off, I’ve heard this phrase “war on Christmas” a lot this year. I guess other folks are picking up on this meme. But I’ve been crusading for Christmas for a long time but I didn’t know it was a war. I don’t think its an organized one. Back in the 90’s the city of Pittsburgh (I live near there) started this idiotic idea of promoting shopping downtown in December by instituting “Sparkle Season”. They had this little blue star that sparkled as a mascot and banners up on the streetlights proclaiming the joys of “Sparkle Season”. Nowhere did they mention Christmas nor any other holiday. It was a total load of politically correct BS and double-speak. They want people to come and spend their money but won’t acknowledge the reason that people are celebrating in the first place. And let’s be honest. It isn’t because of Hannukah that all that money is being spent. That’s a fine thing to celebrate, but its not the economic driver of the season. Neither is Ramadan. The number of people celebrating it is very small in this country, as a percentage of the population. And besides, from what I understand, Ramadan is not joyous celebration, its a time of fasting and penance. It is Christmas that drives people to the stores to buy gifts for others. And the city wouldn’t let the name of the holiday/holy day appear anywhere. City employees were instructed to wish people a “Happy Sparkle Season”. Pittsburgh become a laughing-stock until they abandaned it out of embarrasment.

A similar situation exists with large chain stores like Wal-Mart and Target. They forbid their employees to greet people with a “Merry Christmas” or even respond that way to people who first say it to them. Its silly. When asked about the policy, some pinhead at Wal-Mart actually wrote a response that claimed that Christmas was a mish-mash of pagan celebrations from all over the world while not mentioning Christianity as having a connection to “Christ’s Mass” at all. Even Wal-Mart executives couldn’t swallow that one and apologized for it. It was never clear to me what that wacko response had to do with forbidding a greeting of “Merry Christmas” anyway.

Last year, the mayor of Denver decreed that greetings of “Merry Christmas” were banned from public buildings. The Christmas Parade would now be known as the “Parade of Lights” and a local church group that had always marched and sang carols in the parade was now forbidden to take part. After this was publicized, the firestorm of criticism caused the rocket scientist mayor to rescind the order. So yes, maybe its silly to have to talk about this stuff over and over again, but if we didn’t, Denver’s mentally challenged mayor would have had his way.

There was also a story or two last year about some local governments forbidding some family from putting a creche up on their own property because they lived near the entrance to town. Apparently, the busybodies in local government thought that the proximity of the creche on private property to the town’s “Welcome to…” sign instigated a Constitutional crisis.

So you see, I find that its usually governments, large corporations, and other institutions, which are overwhelmingly run by the whiny, pompous, and bureaucratic politically correct crowd that are the offenders here. And they almost always go too far and abuse their authority in these matters. As I mentioned in my posting, I don’t usually hear about Jews, Muslims, Hindus, or any other religious group objecting to mentions of Christmas. In fact, I often hear about Jewish groups sticking up for the greetings and displays of Christmas decorations. Jewish people, especially, know about how a climate of religious intolerance starts out with fairly small, minor issues and grows. They don’t want it to happen to them or to us Christians.

As to atheists… well, I didn’t mention them at all. “Secular fundamentalists”, a term coined by (as far as I know) Jerry Bowyer, a local Pittsburgh talk show host, refers not to atheists generally, but to these whiny politically correct folk who think that the mere mention of something Christian is an offense. They go so far as to believe that even acknowledging the existence of a holiday that has become very secular in nature with icons like Santa Claus, reindeer, snowmen, and trees and characterized by rampant consumerism will still hint of Christianity and be an offense. They never seem to take the same strident tone when mentions of other religions come up. Apparently, either Christianity is the only religion that is offensive just by mentioning it or Christians being offended by mentions of other religions don’t count. Besides, the whole idea of mentioning or referring to a particular religion or particular holiday/holy day being an “offense” is ridiculous. Now, I suppose that some atheists may be secular fundamentalists, but I never implied that all atheists are secular fundamentalists. I never mentioned atheists. If you want an example of a secular fundamentalist then read this post. I think the woman I write about in that post qualifies. She also seems to be an atheist, according to her comments. But that’s not a causal link. Secular fundamentalists tend to be either atheists, marxists, new-age, or neo-pagan types. But not all atheists, new-age, or neo-pagan types are secular fundamentalists. Most marxists are, however… by definition.

So everyone should feel free to let rip with “Merry Christmas”, “Happy Hanukkah”, “Mediocre Monday” or whatever. If someone takes offense… well, that is *their* problem.

So there are my examples. But I never characterized it as a “war on Christmas”. You used that term not me. I’m simply recognizing that there have been more and more governmental bodies, corporations and other institutions trying to dictate what people can and can’t acknowledge to each other about Christmas over the past few years. The term “war on Christmas” implies that its some organized conspiracy. I don’t think that’s happening at all. I just think its rampant political correctness by the ultra-left ensconced in the various bureaucracies, and the spineless reaction of large corporations who want to make everything gray and bland to avoid any hint of controversy. They know the biggest whiners are the politically correct crowd, so they cave. And I don’t think even the politically correct wackos are organized about it. Its just they way they are. Religion is an affront to them, so they react against it. People having fun over a holiday that is primarily, in spite of the commercialism, a religious holy day is an affront to them. So they react predictably. And I, being political incorrectness incarnate, like to stand up, get in their face, and say, “no” to them. The whole tone of my post, in case it got lost in the typing, was one big grin on my face. I’m not interested in going after these folks hammer and tongs. I’m interested in bellowing “Merry Christmas” with a big grin, a big laugh, and a big slap on the back in their presence just to make them seethe. :) These are the type of folk who just can’t stand it when someone goes about their “merry” way, right in front of them, having a good time, and ignoring their edicts about the proper, politically correct way to behave.

And lastly, I have no idea what Bill O’Reilly says on the matter. I can’t stand the man. He’s pompous and full of himself. I don’t watch the show, its just way too annoying. I only watch two shows on FNC: the evening news show anchored by Brit Hume and the show “Fox News Watch” which is a media analysis show about how the media has reported on the news of the week. Both of those shows feature balanced panels of liberals, moderates, and conservatives and they all get a chance to talk without shouting.

To which I replied thusly:

I suspect that the “sparkle season” (which I haven’t looked up but will) is the result of a marketing scheme. A way to brand pittsburg as something different and special. I’d bet that “sparkle season” started not in the brain of an ultra-left, whiny, bureaucrat but as the careful studied result of dozens brainstorming sessions and focus groups. An enduring legacy of political correctness? Probably not? A desire to not acknowledge the “reason for the season” as it were? I doubt it. It was branding pure and simple. I just read that it lasted for 8 years and was simply retired without much fanfare. It sounds like the advertising scheme simply got old.

About Wal-Mart and target, it seems to me that they would like to be all inclusive because they want everyone to shop there. Obviously you disagree that it’s the right thing to do but I guarantee you that giving instructions on how to greet people is by no means limited to the holiday season. Anyhow, I’m sure that any greeting they give (in fact probably the vast majority of interactions that the employees have with the customers at all) are run through marketing agencies, psychologist groups, and focus groups until they find the one greeting or other interaction that elicits the most sales from its potential customers. In short, if using Merry Christmas were more advantageous in terms of sales, they’d be using it. In fact, Wal-Mart has likely found this to be the case now given the publicity from the likes of Fox News.

Individuals in governments have always made bad decisions. That is exactly why our Government was designed to have checks and balances. But a few silly decisions does not a movement make.

Now all that said, I think obviously we see some common ground when it comes to corporations. They market the holiday season in the same way that they market anything. The idea is to get you thinking about spending money on whatever product they are moving and nothing else. Don’t kid yourself for one second that now that Wal-Mart is using Merry Christmas (or so I’ve heard) that their grinch hearts have grown three sizes. They’re simply pandering. They’d hang upside down crosses and paint pentagrams on the ground if their focus groups indicated that would bring more people into the stores. I’m sure there are plenty of executives who are religious and maybe even deeply so. But it isn’t religion that is motivating them to sell their warez, and it isn’t religion or the fear of offending some massive mysterious group of people that is motivating them to greet you in a certain way. It’s money, pure and simple. Lots and lots and lots of money. Is it right? Is it wrong? I’ve got no idea. I’m quite disgusted by the whole corporate machine thing anyhow (Naomi Klein ruined me on all of that). What I do know is that as long as you’re in their store buying things and not interfering with other people buying things, they couldn’t care less about you or anything you have to say including Merry Christmas.

I would say you’re definitely right. The politically correct crowd does a great deal of whining. In this case, it is the crowd whining for Christmas political correctness that is doing all the whining.

He's got some good points, but I think he's far off base for some things. The Christmas season is the time of year that a vast majority of retailers go into the black. That's why they call the day after Thanksgiving (the busiest shopping day of the year) "Black Friday." Up until the last month and 6 days of the year, most retailers are sitting in negative numbers and they depend on a robust Christmas shopping season to bring them into the positive side. The vast majority of us experience Christmas as we experience just about everything else, through the TV and at the Mall. We are not in Church for a month straight reveling in the joy of Christ's birth (if that's what we believe). We are at home watching commercials that make us laugh or make us cry but mostly make us want to go out and buy what they're selling. So my argument is that this season is only about Christ as much as it has to be to get people to the mall or to Wal-Mart or whatever. But the bottom line is not religion, it is commerce. This country's economy (in fact most economies around the world) would collapse without the shopping season that is Christmas. Sure, on Christmas eve or Christmas day there are plenty who celebrate in their own way be it religious or not. But let's face it, it is not a personal religious reflection that makes kids run down the stairs in the morning. It is gifts under the tree.

So to everyone who reads this I wish you a very Merry Giftmas!

Activist Judge Cancels Christmas...

2005-12-14T11:10:00.000-08:00

The Onion, as usual, is on top of the story.

The supposed "War on Christmas"

2005-12-13T22:21:00.000-08:00

Those on the right swear it exists, those on the left mock it and them mercilessly, yes it's time to give season's greetings to the happy holiday tradition of fighting the War on Christmas. Today I hope to strap on some body armor and my kevlar and embed myself in the trenches, to ride along in the HMMWV's, to hunker down in the foxhole journalist-style (or at least curious observer-style) and find out what all the hubbub is about.

But where do I start? I could go right to the top, the supreme commander of the noble and righteous Corps de Christo, Bill O'Reilly. But really, I'd be as likely to get a response from O'Reilly as I would from Gen. Abizaid. Really to be honest O'Reilly creeps me out. From his horribly embarassing Loofa episode *shiver* to the new threats to "bring horror" to those who wishes someone happy holidays. I tried a google search but apparently this war on christmas (or at least the war on the war on christmas) was started sometime around the end of Thanksgiving (you know, the war on the war on Christmas starts earlier and earlier these days, pretty soon we'll be bringing horror on people by Halloween!). Any google searches were painfully out of date so striking up a conversation with the front line grunts in the war would be about as worthwhile as trying to access the supreme commander himself.

Enter Technorati. With the miracle of technorati I can a list of blogs that are discussing a given topic in order of freshness. Sweet! Finally I get to try to discuss this with someone who is right there on the front lines, someone who has the topic right there in the front of his or her brain. So who did technorati lead me to? A little blog (judging by the small number of comments - not that mine is huge or anything) called Small But Disorganized. If you read the link you'll find that the anonymous blogger is really into the christmas thing. The site is red and green, the title image is an image of a wal-mart-esque lighted natvity scene with the words "Merry Christmas!" prominently displayed over it. The link in particular is about a fantasy of going out and bringing all the "secular fundamentalists" to their knees by running up to each and every one of them in a department store (where we all congregate obviously) and wishing a very stern "Merry Christmas." I've found my front line warrior, time to engage.

My first line of questioning? Just who in the world are these people who are offended by the term Merry Christmas? Can you point me to them? If not, where did you learn about them? Here's what I wrote...

Ain't technorati grand? You're the first person on this side of the issue that I came across and I just thought I'd strike up a conversation about this whole war on christmas thing.

Just out of curiosity, who are these people that are offended by people wishing them a Merry Christmas? I'm an atheist, most of my friends are atheists, lots are Christian, some are Jewish, and a couple are Hindu [EDIT: I've met a couple of people who are Hindu, I can't really say that I know if they're offended or use the term Merry Christmas but the rest stands...]. None of us are at all upset by the phrase "merry christmas". In fact, I can't think of a single one of us who hasn't wished someone a merry christmas.

Now I know that Bill O'Reilly has insisted that there is some big secret legion of anti-Christmas / anti-Christian warriors out there that are driven by the one single solitary goal of ridding the US of Christianity and free will in general. But O'Reilly is insane. First of all, you should never trust anyone that tells you that any group of atheists could get together and organize anything let alone a massive country-wide conspiracy involving a massive media machine. Second, despite what everyone says, not only do we atheists not believe in God, we don't care who does.

But maybe I just haven't gotten my invitation. In which case, I'm pissed.

So anyhow, do you have some kind of link to an example of a "secular fundamentalist" who has taken offense at the term Merry Christmas? I would definitely like to hop on over to their blog (assuming they're a blogger, but really who isn't these days?) and ask them a similar series of questions. If you've got no example then I must ask where did you get the idea that there is a war on christmas at all?

I'll post this comment over at my blog (see, everyone's got a blog these days) and I've subscribed to these comments. I really am curious about all of this. Hopefully you can enlighten me a bit.

Here's hoping that we get a dialog going.

My God I love Jennifer Aniston!

2005-11-06T21:22:00.000-08:00

In a recent interview with Newsweek, Jennifer Aniston named 7 things that she'd rather talk about than everything the tabloids have been putting her through. The last two stick out for me:

The state of the world. How about that indictment?! And why did it take so long to respond to the crisis in New Orleans? Everything is imploding. It all seems to lead back to our dear president.

Radiohead. When are they going to make a new album? Where are they? Where did they go?

That just gets me all misty eyed...

My New Blog...

2005-10-31T15:45:00.000-08:00

So if you don't know, I've got a new blog. You can now find me at http://blog.mikelanestudios.com/. It's the blog for the business I'm building (slowly but surely) at http://www.mikelanestudios.com/. Come on over and take a look why don't you?

Spinning plates...

2005-09-13T23:12:00.000-07:00

While you make pretty speeches
I'm being cut to shreds.
You feed me to the lions
A delicate balance.

And this just feels like spinning plates.
I'm living in cloud cuckoo land.
And this just feels like spinning plates.
My body's floating down the muddy river.

-Radiohead

A new website to check out...

2005-07-01T01:08:00.000-07:00

Image courtesy of Dean Malaxos Photography

Dean is a new photographer friend of mine that I met on Dgrin. He has some awesome landscapes and he is a very talented wedding photographer. If you are from Portland and are looking for a fantastic wedding photographer, I suggest you check out Dean's site!

Pics from Thailand posted.

2005-07-01T00:50:00.000-07:00

A few shots of mine from Thailand. There's more to see over at my photography website.

Sorry I haven't posted in a while. I did have access to the net in Thailand, but I just wasn't ever in a good position to be able to post anything. Anyhow, I wanted to make sure that everyone knew that I had some Thailand pictures posted. Let me know what you think.

Bankok Blogging...

2005-04-30T18:49:00.000-07:00

You know you grew up in the 80s if you've ever seen this video

I do like it very much when the hotel that I'm staying in has free wi-fi internet access. Not too bad of a trip so far. I am scheduled to go to Chiang Mai of course, but they made it so we stay one night in Bankok (and the world's my oyster) before we head on up there.

The good news is that I've talked to some people who know the schedule of events that say we get a couple of days off in the middle and that our days don't go past 1500 or 1600 each day. So it shouldn't be too taxing and I should definitely get to go on at least one tour. If they have it, I'm going to go visit the Karen tribes to see if I can get any shots like this:

Women from the Karen Padauong tribe that lives in Northwest Thailand and Southeast Myanmar

Of course, I'm no National Geographic photographer so it may not be exactly like that, but you get the idea hopefully.

Come one come all!!!

2005-04-28T12:49:00.000-07:00

Come on over and get your high quality at ease gear!

Were you just thinking silently to yourself, "Boy, I sure do wish I could find some moderately funny shirts and crap to show my solidarity with some guy with a website"? If so, have I got a deal for you over at the at ease Shameless Marketing Extravaganza! Proudly wear an inside joke like an "I don't know what you're going to eat" Bar-B-Q apron, tell the world how important you are with a "My Mom says I'm a catch..." T-shirt, or make everyone stare intently at your chest with a long life quote by Walt Whitman.

We're working hard every day to create new and exciting products so check back often!

El-e-va-tion!

2005-04-27T00:01:00.000-07:00

Finally a reasonable picture of the elipse from the U2 shows

Okay, so I wanted to point out exactly where I was for Monday's U2 shows. I think it's pretty clear that I was one of the lucky few. And to think that Dave Peck bought those tickets a mere 6 hours before the show started. Un freaking real. So all the U2 guys were out walking around on the elipse that you see there from time to time.

What a great night.

And now a moment in history...

2005-04-26T02:01:00.000-07:00

Do you remember the good old days? You know, way back when. Like when the administration still insisted that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq just waiting to be found. They said that they knew were the weapons were, that they were "in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

Well as it turns out, it is official, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, none, nada, zippo. All the proof the administration said they had, Tony Blair's dossier, everything wrong. Dead wrong (and now there may be up to 100,000 dead Iraqis to go with that). The tragically funny thing is that this ultimately makes Saddam Hussein more trustworthy than George W. Bush. Do you remember that big contriversial interview that Dan Rather did with Saddam Hussein on Feb 24, 2003? Here is a small snippet of a transcript from that interview:

Translator For Saddam Hussein: Thank you. The President says, the United States - the world - knows that there is nothing in Iraq of… whatever the noise has been made about. And I believe that that noise and the fleets that have been brought around and the mobilization that's been done were, in fact, done partly to cover the huge lie that was being waged against Iraq about chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

And it was on that basis that Iraq actually accepted Resolution - accepted it, even though Iraq was absolutely certain that what it had said, what the Iraqi officials…had kept saying, that… Iraq was empty, was void of any such weapons, was the case. But Iraq accepted that resolution… in order not to allow any misinterpretation of its position.

And, indeed, in order to make the case absolutely clear that Iraq was no longer in possession of any such…weapons. Iraq accepted to agree to deal with that resolution. That is why, when you talk about such missiles, these missiles have been destroyed. There are no missiles that are contrary to the prescription of the United Nations in Iraq.

These missiles were des - missiles that were proscribed - have been destroyed and are no longer there.

Hindsight is 20/20 you might say. Better to attack and not find them than not attack and get hit with them. Everyone thought there were weapons.

Not exactly

[July 17, 2002]RITTER: No one has substantiated the allegations that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction or is attempting to acquire weapons of mass destruction. And of course that is the reason we have been given for going to war against Iraq -- because of the threat posed by these weapons. It has been nothing but rhetorically laced speculation, not hard facts, that have been presented by either the United States or Great Britain to back this up, and until they provide hard facts, there is no case for war.

...

RITTER: I believe Washington D.C. is using the concept of inspections as a political foil to justify war. America doesn't want to inspectors to return. The best way to stop war is to get the inspectors back in. I believe it should be the policy of the United Nations to get the inspectors back in.

Scott Ritter became the "liberal" media's pinata until his credibility was completely shot. Then we attacked and now everything that he ever said has come true.

Kind of makes you want to scream doesn't it?

Holy cow what a night!

2005-04-26T01:35:00.000-07:00

Just a short post for now because I'm tired as all get out but I'll post more tomorrow. Not only did we have general admission tickets to the U2 show tonight, 2 of the 3 of us won the random drawing to get into the elipse. Yeah, I was 10 or so feet from Bono. Awesome! Even better, a little while later I turned around and saw Eddie Vedder standing not 15 feet away from me. Totally cool! I even got to say hi to Eddie and he said hi back. Sweet!

What an amazing show and to be where I was...oh man it was just unreal.

Raise your hand if you saw U2 last night!

2005-04-25T18:17:00.000-07:00

ooh ooh, I did! I did!

Now raise your hand if you're going to be seeing U2 again tonight.

NICE!

More to the point, I'm going to be seeing U2 again and this time I have general admission tickets with a chance of randomly being able to go into the elipse to watch Bono and the rest of the band walk out right beside me! Holy freaking cool! I'm so excited.

The show last night was so awesome. Seriously, it was unreal to get to see U2 perform Sunday Bloody Sunday live. Well I'm off. I'll post more tomorrow I'm sure.

So you remember Adam Yoshida?

2005-04-23T14:11:00.000-07:00

So do you remember how I went on a bit of a rant the other day about Adam Yoshida and his ridiculous red herring? Let's flash back to the pertinent parts shall we?

Similarly, I’m against abortion for national security reasons. More abortions means fewer people, which means a smaller economy and fewer potential soldiers (or, alternately, more immigrants, which is also not a sustainable solution).

Boy, oh boy, has Tbogg given me the greatest idea of a gift for that crazy Canuck...

Protect our troops - from the womb to the war. What if the fetus you were going to abort would grow up to be a soldier bringing democracy to a godless dictatorship?

Plastic replica of an 11-12 week old fetus, 3" long, holding a firearm in its precious little hand, with an assortment of other military paraphernalia, encased in a translucent plastic ornament, with a patriotic yellow ribbon on top. Includes a metal ornament hanger. If only a womb were this safe, attractive and reasonably priced!

Show that you support the "culture of life" by buying and proudly displaying one of these patriotic unborn Americans.

Also available in a "Brown" model

This is a real product, from a real site, selling real products. This is NOT a parody. This is a real store.

It's amazing, someone else actually sees the world just like Adam Yoshida does!

Red State Priorities...

2005-04-22T09:43:00.000-07:00

South Carolina is well on its way to making cock fighting a felony punishable up to 5 years in prison but has tabled a domestic violence bill that would do the same thing for a man who abuses his wife. Both Domestic abuse and cockfighting are currently misdemeanors and thanks to boneheads like state Rep. John Graham Altman (R. Dist. 119-Charleston) domestic violence will remain so for at least another year.

Just to recap: The South Carolina legislature thinks that the lives of chickens are more important than the lives of women. And to think, Beth and I could possibly be moving there after this. Great.

And now the at ease wierd Google search of the day!

2005-04-21T09:24:00.000-07:00

Any site that is indexed on google and is linked from other pages gets some odd search engine hits from time to time. I thought this one was pretty funny. If you search the following in Google:

experimenting childs plants for school (grass) to see what one will grow stronger or faster with trash

You get at ease as the 23rd result. Good luck to the student in Bensalem Pennsylvania who is apparently trying to do some research on trash consuming plants (specifically grass). I'm sorry my site was no help to you.

This is kind of fun...

2005-04-20T07:45:00.000-07:00

Your Linguistic Profile:

70% General American English

10% Dixie

10% Yankee

5% Midwestern

5% Upper Midwestern

What Kind of American English Do You Speak?

This test asks questions like what do you call a sugary carbonated beverage Pop or Soda? I'm a soda man myself. There were some things I'd never heard before in that test. Pretty cool.

When it rains it pours...

2005-04-15T19:40:00.000-07:00

Adam Yoshida (my favorite nutcase) is at it again. Mr. loser waxes all poetic on what he sees as the grand delusions of the liberals. You know, there's nothing quite as close to the truth as an Adam Yoshida disertation on the merits (or lack thereof) of liberalism.

Witness Adam's first hypothesis. When asked why he thought people were social liberals by a liberal friend of his (a female which presumably means she is cute enough not to be caught up in the imaginary Yoshida liberal kill fest), he had this to say:

They’re under the sway of the illusion of the permanence of all things.

What does that mean you ask? Well good question. Leading linguists, scientists, and astrologers are hard at work this very minute trying to deduce any meaning from that statement. Preliminary findings leaked to at ease are that it is pseudo intellectual drivel from a particularly awkward guy with little or no social skills intended to attract a mate. That is science-speak for he's trying to get a little liberal tail by making them think he's smart.

Adam proceeds to go into a rant about declining fertility rates and fuel shortages that his imaginary friend told him won't actually happen. These arguments would certainly bring modern liberalism to its knees if anyone could figure out why we were supposed to care about fertility rates or what he thinks the future of the fuel supply was going to be.

This is all just fun banter leading up to Adam's primary conjectures. First that we can't allow homosexual marriage because that will affect the security of our country and second that we can't allow abortion because that means we are literally killing future soldiers before they are born. Have a look!

I view moral issues as national security issues. I’m not simply opposed to gay marriage because I believe that it’s an abomination against God, I’m against it because I believe that it’s a threat to our future security. The advance of homosexuality and other ideologies of personal indulgence threaten our security because they will surely weaken our resolve to resist future threats.

Similarly, I’m against abortion for national security reasons. More abortions means fewer people, which means a smaller economy and fewer potential soldiers (or, alternately, more immigrants, which is also not a sustainable solution).

So let's follow the logic chain on these shall we?

Homosexuals are allowed to get married
???
The US gets overthrown by China!!!!

Wow, scary stuff. What about the abortion thing?

The government isn't allowed to tell a woman what to do with her body
???
The US gets overthrown by North Korea!!!!

My goodness! Run for the hills!!!

The relatively astitute among you may be saying to yourself, "That's silly, Mr. Yoshida is simply trying to reinforce his arguments by making us afraid of the consequences." The really smart cookies out there will say to yourself, "That Adam is trying to get away with a red herring again." For the uninformed a red herring is a logical fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.

No wonder this guy is such a loser.

Cat blogging...(Sorry Karlo!)

2005-04-15T19:27:00.000-07:00

So it appears that Stevens is all better now. For the uninformed he is our cat that had the runs ever since we got him. He used to be very small for his age with thin hair and now he's much bigger with a great coat and has the run of the house along with Sierra. He's hella cute and very fun to be around ... I no longer feel the need to drop kick him off the Tacoma Narrows bridge.

Very cool!

Friday's Random 10

2005-04-15T18:35:00.000-07:00

I personally prefer my Rio Karma to the iPod...

Time for this Friday's random 10!

Artist - Title

Tool - Stinkfist
Alice in Chains - I Can't Remember
John Hartford - Indian War Whoop [Instrumental]
Frank Sinatra - Luck Be a Lady
Prince - U Got the Look
David Byrne - Wicked Little Doll
The Clash - Brand New Cadillac
Nine Inch Nails - Ruiner
Cream - Mother's Lament
Alice in Chains - Would?

Marching towards a brave new world...

2005-04-15T17:11:00.000-07:00

The way I see it, Senator Frist is using the "religious card" for one of two reasons. First, and least disturbing to me personally, is that he (as a dirty whore politician) is trying to wring every last ounce of power out of the fanatical religious right as he possibly can. That is to say that he is fundamentally unconcerned with the ideals and goals of the fanatical Christians but is more than willing to use them to achieve any and all of his goals. Assuming this to be the case (and it may be, after all others in his party - like Bush - haven't found it necessary to pay back the fanatical fundies for their votes this past election), one has to wonder what it feels like to get so used and abused.

Second, and particularly disturbing to me, is that this is Frist's strategy to change this country into a theocracy. This seems to be a possibility because the right wingers are embracing the fanatical fundies like never before. Seriously, just listen in for a while to Laura Ingraham, Michael Medved, Sean Hannity, and others. You'll start to see what I mean. This could well be a concerted effort on a part of the right to force religion into the Constitution - and could very well be payback to and the cementing of support of the fanatical fundies. If it truly was the religious zealots of this country that elected Bush and his conservative counterparts, what better way to ensure that support doesn't go away than to insert it into the Constitution?

The idea of a Constitutional Theocracy should make everyone nervous. What is Frist up to?

at ease

Merry Christmas!

Fucking Embarrassing

War on Christmas Debate

Activist Judge Cancels Christmas...

The supposed "War on Christmas"

My God I love Jennifer Aniston!

My New Blog...

Spinning plates...

A new website to check out...

Pics from Thailand posted.

Bankok Blogging...

Come one come all!!!

El-e-va-tion!

And now a moment in history...

Holy cow what a night!

Raise your hand if you saw U2 last night!

So you remember Adam Yoshida?

Red State Priorities...

And now the at ease wierd Google search of the day!

This is kind of fun...

Your Linguistic Profile:

More problems for the US Air Force Academy

When it rains it pours...

Cat blogging...(Sorry Karlo!)

Friday's Random 10

Marching towards a brave new world...